国内外压力容器分类探讨

王凯, 陈志伟, 元少昀

特种设备学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 69-76.

特种设备学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 69-76. DOI: 10.27022/j.issn2097-7697.2026.02.010
监管科学

国内外压力容器分类探讨

  • 王凯1,3, 陈志伟1,3, 元少昀2
作者信息 +

Discussion on the Current Status of Pressure Vessel Classification at Domestic and Abroad

  • WANG Kai1, 3, CHEN Zhiwei1, 3, YUAN Shaoyun2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

压力容器的科学分类是实现差异化安全监管的基础,对设备安全与行业经济效益具有重要意义。本文系统梳理了中国、欧盟、美国现行的压力容器分类方法,从设计制造、行政许可、使用管理等维度,总结不同地区对各类压力容器的管控要求,并通过多维度对比揭示三者的分类逻辑与管控体系差异。研究发现,目前我国第Ⅰ类与第Ⅱ类压力容器在设计制造检验、使用管理及行政许可等环节未设置差异化要求,导致该层级分类缺乏实际监管意义。针对此问题,本文从法规体系完善、技术标准细化等方面提出优化建议,为我国压力容器分类体系的改进与完善提供参考和思路。

Abstract

The scientific classification of pressure vessels serves as the basis for differentiated safety supervision and holds great significance to the safety of equipment and the economic benefit of the industry. The current classification methods for pressure vessels in China, the European Union and the United States have been systematically sorted out from the dimensions of design and fabrication, administrative licensing, and use management. The control requirements for various types of pressure vessels in different regions have been summarized, and the classification logic and control system differences among the three have been revealed through multi-dimensional comparisons. It is found that, currently no differentiated requirements are set for the design, fabrication, inspection, use management and administrative licensing of the Ⅰ and Ⅱ category pressure vessels in China, which leads to the lack of practical regulatory significance of this hierarchical classification. To address this issue, optimization recommendations are proposed from dimensions including the refinement of the regulatory framework and the elaboration of technical standards, thereby offering references and insights for the advancement and perfection of China’s pressure vessel classification system.

关键词

压力容器 / 分类 / 法规 / 标准 / 监管

Key words

Pressure vessel / Classification / Regulation / Standards / Supervision

引用本文

导出引用
王凯, 陈志伟, 元少昀. 国内外压力容器分类探讨[J]. 特种设备学报, 2026, 1(2): 69-76. https://doi.org/10.27022/j.issn2097-7697.2026.02.010
WANG Kai, CHEN Zhiwei, YUAN Shaoyun. Discussion on the Current Status of Pressure Vessel Classification at Domestic and Abroad[J].Journal of Special Equipment, 2026, 1(2): 69-76. https://doi.org/10.27022/j.issn2097-7697.2026.02.010
中图分类号: X933.4   

参考文献

[1] 郑津洋,吴琳琳,寿比南,等.《固定式压力容器安全技术监察规程》压力容器分类[J].压力容器,2009,26(5):1-5.
[2] 万里平,黄勇力.关于ASME Ⅷ-2(2017版)修订内容中新增容器类别的讨论[J].压力容器,2018,35(3):39-43.
[3] 魏杰.欧盟承压设备新指令下的分类及符合性评审模式的选择[J].现代制造技术与装备,2017(4):141-142.
[4] TSG R0004—2009 固定式压力容器安全技术监察规程[S].
[5] TSG 21—2016 固定式压力容器安全技术监察规程[S].
[6] 康昊源,邵珊珊,谢国山.浅析新国标GB/T 42594—2023《承压设备介质危害分类导则》[J].中国特种设备安全,2024,40(12):19-22.
[7] 王凯,周芸萌,贾晓亮,等.介质危害分类标准实施对压力容器影响的研究[J].石油化工设备,2026,55(2):67-73.
[8] 97/23/EC 承压设备指令[S].
[9] 2014/68/EU 承压设备指令[S].
[10] 徐顺序.欧盟承压设备指令的无损检测要求[J].无损检测,2017,39(11):71-73.
[11] 白建涛,车达,李明宇.中外压力容器分类方法对比[J].炼油与化工,2023,34(1):15-18.
[12] ASME BPVC.Ⅷ.2—2017 ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, Section VIII: Rules for construction of pressure vessels—Division 2: Alternative rules[S].
[13] ASME BPVC.Ⅱ.D.M—2017 ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, Section Ⅱ: Materials—Part D: Properties (Metric)[S].
[14] 杨晨.ASME Ⅷ-2中等级1、2容器的建造说明[J].一重技术,2019(4):22-24.
[15] TSG 07—2019 特种设备生产和充装单位许可规则[S].
[16] ASME BPVC.Ⅷ.2—2023 ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, Section VIII: Rules for construction of pressure vessels—Division 2: Alternative rules[S]. 
[17] GB/T 150.1~150.4—2024压力容器[S].
[18] GB/T 4732.1~4732.6—2024压力容器分析设计[S].

基金

国家重点研发计划课题“超高压反应器基于寿命的设计制造技术研究及应用”(2023YFB3408302)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/